Ihre Suche

Abstract „‚Die grenzüberschreitende Zusammenarbeit muss krisenfester werden‘ – Sätze wie dieser sind häufig zu lesen, wenn es um Lehren geht, die grenzregionale Verantwortliche aus den Erfahrungen mit der Covid-19-Pandemie seit Frühjahr 2020 zogen. Unilaterales Handeln der Nationalstaaten hatte weitreichende Störungen des Alltags in Grenzregionen mit sich gebracht. Dies zeigte sich deutlich in der eng verflochtenen Region SaarLorLux, wo die zeitweisen Grenzreglementierungen Etabliertes ‚über den Haufen warfen‘. Doch wie blicken politisch und administrativ Verantwortliche auf die Pandemie zurück, die sie als globale Gesundheitskrise rahmen? Und was verstehen Entscheidungsträger:innen konkret unter einer krisenfesteren Zusammenarbeit für die Zukunft? Konzeptuell in ein konstruktivistisches Krisen- und Resilienzverständnis eingeordnet, gehen wir diesen Fragen aufbauend auf Interviews mit politischen und administrativen Vertreter:innen aus dem Mehrebenen-Geflecht mit Fokus auf die Region SaarLorLux nach. Zentrale Institutionen und Akteure in der grenzüberschreitenden Zusammenarbeit waren – so zeigen unsere Ergebnisse – ebenso entscheidend für ein Funktionieren in Krisenzeiten wie ein vertrautes und routiniertes Miteinander in der Region SaarLorLux.“

Abstract: „Widespread cross-border activities and relations have moved European integration step by step from what was once the European periphery towards the centre. This Working Paper spotlights the SaarLorLux region and describes cross-border cooperation at grass-roots level, as realized in specific activities in 2024. Relevant data is derived from quantitative surveys at the communal (urban and rural district) level in Saarland, the département Moselle, and the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, complemented by in-depth interviews with representatives of these bodies. The results show that decision makers at this level associate Europe closely with open borders, the common currency, and solidarity, and hence widely agree with the thesis that border regions are – despite all obstacles – laboratories of European integration. The sense of a joint borderland and of connection with Europe is correspondingly high, especially in districts directly on the border. The advantages of the border situation are real and present to those who live here, but the Covid pandemic has nevertheless left traces that have not yet been entirely erased. In this light, future cross-border cooperation calls for further positive input at the local level to fill the concept of Europe with life.“

Abstract „Die Krisenfestigkeit grenzüberschreitender Verflechtungsräume im Sinne des folgenden Beitrages bezieht sich auf die Fähigkeit von Räumen, flexibel auf Veränderungsprozesse und neue Herausforderungen reagieren zu können und ihre Lernfähigkeit zielgerichtet auf ihre Widerstands- und Anpassungsfähigkeit auszurichten. „Krisenfestigkeit“ wird dabei mit „Resilienz“ und „Zukunftsfähigkeit“ im Bereich der räumlichen Entwicklung gleichgesetzt. Der Artikel legt den Schwerpunkt auf den Aufbau geeigneter Organisations- und Akteursstrukturen im deutsch-luxemburgischen Grenzraum der Obermosel vor und insbesondere während der Covid-19-Pandemie. Das Praxisbeispiel des „Entwicklungskonzeptes Oberes Moseltal“ (EOM) veranschaulicht die Bedeutung einer langjährigen strukturierten Zusammenarbeit regionaler Akteure für die Zukunftsfähigkeit des Grenzraumes. Maßgeblich verantwortlich dafür, dass das EOM in den Zeiten der Pandemie in die Umsetzung gebracht werden konnte, war die politisch getragene Entscheidung, ein grenzüberschreitendes Regionalmanagement einzurichten. Im Folgenden werden die Pandemieauswirkungen für den Prozess aus einer Innensicht aufgegriffen. Zudem wird die Zusammenarbeit der Akteure unter dem Aspekt der Krisenfestigkeit beleuchtet.“

Aus dem Verlagstext: „Cet ouvrage propose une analyse croisée de la crise sanitaire en Belgique, au Canada et en Suisse, avec une attention singulière portée à Bruxelles, Montréal et Genève. Les observations menées dans ces différents contextes permettent d'identifier certaines récurrences en matière d'inégalités sociales de santé. Si celles-ci sont bien connues des professionnels de la santé et documentées dans la littérature scientifique depuis de nombreuses années, les interrogations relatives à leur rôle dans la propagation de la Covid-19 et de ses effets différenciés au sein de la population n'ont été formulées qu'assez tardivement. Produit d'un travail pluridisciplinaire, cet ouvrage met particulièrement l'accent sur les conséquences sociales et de santé des mesures gouvernementales prises durant cette crise sanitaire sur les populations les plus précarisées. En dépit des variations politiques liées aux contextes nationaux, un même cadrage des politiques publiques a prévalu. Il ressort que ce dernier a été dominé par des préoccupations et des données médicales et épidémiologiques, mais il s'est montré très peu sensible aux enjeux des inégalités sociales qui n'ont été abordés qu'à l'occasion des difficultés rencontrées lors des campagnes de vaccination.“

Abstract: „Cette contribution propose un regard comparatif sur la communication relative à la pandémie publiée par différentes institutions de la Grande Région. Sont analysés à titre d’exemple des extraits de communiqués du Sommet de la Grande Région, des documents de presse ainsi que les sites web de trois universités sélectionnées. Les analyses révèlent des aspects spécifiques concernant l’approche et la construction discursive de l’espace de vie de la Grande Région, selon le groupe d’acteur·rice·s, la fonction et la date de publication des documents au cours de la pandémie.“

Abstract: „La pandémie de Covid-19 a mis à rude épreuve les multiples formes d’échanges transfrontaliers au sein de ce que l’on appelle la Grande Région. En effet, les restrictions frontalières mises en place pour limiter les impacts de la pandémie s’opposaient à ce qui, ici, était depuis longtemps devenu la normalité politique, économique et sociale. En s’appuyant sur des hypothèses théoriques et conceptuelles issues des border studies, l’article présente les effets de la pandémie sur la région frontalière franco-germano-belgo-luxembourgeoise et ses habitant·e·s. Les processus de rebordering enclenchés au printemps 2020 ont fortement perturbé les pratiques professionnelles, économiques et quotidiennes transfrontalières. En tant qu’espace d’interdépendance, de zone de contact et de transition, le borderland, avec ses fortes interactions et interdépendances transfrontalières, s’était entre-temps transformé en zone de conflit. Les nouveaux processus de debordering, initiés aussi bien de manière formelle par les responsables politiques que (et avant tout) de manière informelle par les citoyen·ne·s, suggèrent cependant que la crise peut également être considérée comme une chance car elle a permis de sensibiliser à l’égard des régions frontalières. Après les premiers enseignements tirés par les décideur·e·s à l’issue de l’expérience bouleversante de la première vague de la pandémie, il convient d’explorer à l’avenir dans quelle mesure ces enseignements peuvent être valorisés à long terme et comment la coopération transfrontalière peut être rendue plus résistante aux crises.“

Abstract: „In deze bijdrage worden juridische kanttekeningen geplaatst bij het recent verschenen, kritische rapport van de Onderzoeksraad voor Veiligheid over de aanpak van de coronacrisis. Door zijn beleidsmatige en puur nationaal gerichte insteek blijven belangrijke vragen en oplossingsrichtingen onbesproken. Wel wordt terecht gesteld dat corona te lang als een infectieziekteprobleem en eerder als een maatschappelijke crisis had moeten worden bestempeld.“

Abstract: „Wereldwijd bestaan er zorgen dat de COVID-19-maatregelen hebben geleid tot een toename van huiselijk geweld. In deze studie kijken we naar de huiselijk geweldadviezen die door alle 26 Veilig Thuis-regio’s in Nederland zijn geregistreerd. Om te onderzoeken of er verschillen zijn in de geregistreerde omvang, vermoedelijke aard en type adviesvrager van huiselijk geweldadviezen voor, tijdens en na de invoering van de COVID-19-maatregelen vergelijken we data van 2019 met 2020 en 2021. De bevindingen laten een algehele toename van adviesvragen in 2020 en 2021 zien, die niet eenduidig kan worden toegeschreven aan de COVID-19-maatregelen. There have been worldwide concerns that the COVID-19 restrictions have led to an increase in domestic violence. In this study the authors examine the domestic violence advices that have been registered by all 26 Veilig Thuis (Safe Home) regions in the Netherlands. To study potential differences in prevalence, suspected nature and the type of person that seeks advice on domestic violence prior and during the COVID-19 pandemic, the authors compare data from 2019 with 2020 and 2021. The findings show a general increase in advices in 2020 and 2021, that cannot be unambiguously attributed to the COVID-19 restrictions.“

Abstract: „Dit artikel onderzoekt het Nederlandse politieke en media discours als reactie op de eerste golf van de wereldwijde covid-19-pandemie. Hierbij staat de vraag centraal in hoe­verre de ontwikkeling en toon van dit discours de logica volgt van wat in de literatuur ook wel aangeduid wordt als ‘regeren door middel van migratiecontrole’. Volgens deze logica wordt migratie naar voren gebracht als een oorzaak van verschillende problematische, complexe, maatschappelijke ontwikkelingen, zelfs als er geen bewijs is om een dergelijk causaal verband te suggereren. Vanwege de veronderstelde relatie tussen migratie en het maatschappelijk probleem – in dit geval de covid-19 pandemie – wordt er een hardere toon in het discours rond migratie aangenomen, en kan dit zich zelf vertalen naar het nemen concrete maatregelen om de mobiliteit van mensen (verder) te beteugelen. Het artikel stelt vast dat, in deze eerste golf van de pandemie, deze specifieke dynamiek niet duidelijk aanwezig is in het Nederlandse politieke discours, noch in het mediadiscours.“

Angaben zum Inhalt: „The influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the relative division of care tasks between mothers and fathers: a longitudinal perspective. For many parents, the combination of work and care was already demanding and unevenly distributed prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic has clearly influenced the relative division of care tasks, but how and why remains unclear. We use longitudinal panel data from the LISS panel, collected in April, June and November 2020, to analyze the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the relative distribution of care by mothers and fathers in the Netherlands. A complex picture emerges from these longitudinal analyses, and several theoretical perspectives appear to be relevant. We conclude that time availability mainly has an effect at the beginning of the pandemic, while relative resources play a role the longer the pandemic endures.“

Angaben zum Inhalt: „The experiences of refugee youth with school closure due to COVID-19: A qualitative study on increasing educational inequality of young people from Syria in Rotterdam This paper focusses on the experiences of Syrian refugee youth in Rotterdam with the first school closure (spring 2020), due to COVID-19 policy measures. Based on repeated qualitative interviews with 19 boys and girls – before, during and after the school closure – we examine how Syrian refugee youth have experienced the school closure, and how this influence their educational position by using the four central tasks of education of Van de Werfhorst and Mijs (2010). Syrian refugee youth in our study emphasize that online education is more difficult to understand and stress they miss their friends at school. Moreover, their circumstances at home are not ideal for online learning, and therefore reaching the appropriate level of education becomes harder. This paper highlights the importance of the social aspect of education. Whereas going to school normally also stimulate friendships and their socialization in Dutch society, the school closure makes this more challenging. Especially for refugee youth school has extra relevance for reasons of e.g. mental health, resiliency, and socialization. Through our case studies, we argue that the school closure contributes to an accumulation of risks and inequalities. We conclude that the school closure will likely increase educational inequality for young people with a refugee background and makes their educational position more vulnerable.“

Angaben zum Inhalt: „The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on subjective well-being of (international) higher education students in the Netherlands In this paper we investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on subjective well-being of higher education students in the Netherlands. More specifically, we compare international students and Dutch students, based on the Dutch data of the COVID-19 International Student Well-Being Study, a cross-sectional survey conducted between May-July 2020 among higher education students across the Netherlands (N = 10.491). Based on the sociological literature on the relationship between social capital and subjective well-being, we investigate in particular whether changes in social contact during the first lockdown can explain differences in subjective well-being between international and Dutch students. Our results suggest that although international students report lower levels of subjective well-being compared to Dutch students, these differences cannot be directly explained by (changes) in social contact during the lockdown.“

Angaben zum Inhalt: „Citizens’ initiatives in times of crisis: An investigation into the factors that influence the durability of citizens’ initiatives In the Netherlands, citizens’ initiatives have received a lot of praise and are increasingly made responsible for providing public services. If they are to fulfil this role, they must be able to weather a crisis, as during a crisis public services should remain reliable. Literature on the durability of citizens’ initiatives suggests that large initiatives, with a close-knit core group and strong government support are the most durable. However, our research indicates that this was not the case during the COVID-19 crisis. Flexibility and freedom to function independently from the municipal government were found to be more decisive for durability. This suggests that despite public value of citizens’ initiatives, they cannot be expected to take much responsibility for durable public service provision.“

Angaben zum Inhalt: „Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on happiness in The Netherlands In the media we read mainly about negative effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on our subjective wellbeing, such as increased depression, anxiety and loneliness. There is less attention for possible positive effects and for this reason it is worth examining how the life-satisfaction of the Dutch population has developed during the pandemic. In the short run, this will help policy makers to balance loss of happiness against loss of lives and in the long run it will help to examine which policies have resulted in the lowest loss of happy life years. In this article, we describe observed effects on happiness in the Netherlands during the pandemic (until spring 2021) using three empirical approaches: 1) trend in subsequent survey studies, 2) analysis of a panel study, and 3) analysis of a dairy study in which mood during daily activities was measured. Average life-satisfaction declined by about 4% of which 3% between summer 2020 and spring 2021. Whereas in the early days of the pandemic, the Dutch population only reported a minor loss of happiness, the decline has become substantial at the end of the road.“

Angaben zum Inhalt: „Changes in informal care provision during the first COVID-19 lockdown in 2020 in the Netherlands. This study investigates to what extent the intensity of informal care provision has changed during the first lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic in the spring of 2020 in the Netherlands, whether these changes differed by the living situation of the care recipient, and whether these changes were associated with changes in indicators for ‘being able to’, ‘have to’ and ‘want to’ provide care (determinants of the Informal Care Model). We collected data in July 2020 among informal caregivers aged 78 and younger who indicated to provide care in March 2020 in the LISS-panel (N = 1,270 care situation of 1,014 caregivers). We found that, on average, informal care provision was reduced during the lockdown; caregivers of care recipients living in care institutions were the most likely to reduce or stop caregiving, and caregivers who helped someone in their own household were most likely to have increased their intensity. Feeling less restricted by the corona measures reduced the likelihood to stop or lower care provision and increased the likelihood of increasing care; being confronted with a reduction of formal care for the care recipient was related to a higher likelihood of increasing care; and stronger concerns about the care recipient increased the likelihood of intensifying care and prevented from stopping or reducing care. We conclude that the COVID-19 measures significantly impacted the amount of informal care provision and that the Informal Care Model provides a useful basis for explaining changes in informal care intensity.“